BRIEFING A BARRISTER
What is a barrister?
A barrister is a lawyer whose ultimate function is to act
as an advocate in court to argue a client’s case. This may be before trial
(the "interlocutory" stage of the case), at trial (where witnesses are
called and evidence is given) or on appeal (where the reasoning and
correctness of the decision of the interlocutory or trial court are
challenged). Barristers prepare documents and give advice connected with
this advocacy function. A barrister is commonly called "counsel".
Unlike a solicitor, usually a barrister does not have a
regular group of clients. The barrister’s work comes from other lawyers. The
lawyer rather than the client is responsible for payment of the barrister’s
fees. A barrister is an independent lawyer. Barristers work individually and
not in firms. However most form communities with other barristers in common
"chambers" which have some shared facilities and services. The barrister
must be free to accept work from all who request it within the constraints
of his or her competence, expertise and experience.
The advocate barrister performs "paper" functions and
advocacy functions. The former include preparing opinions, pleadings (the
material facts of claim or defence), interrogatories (formal questions
seeking to elicit admissions from the opponent) and advice on
evidence (how to prepare for trial). Advocacy work might be carried out in
chambers (pre-trial ["interlocutory"]) hearings, or before a court of
appeal.
Increasingly in Australia, in addition to their
experience in court many barristers have acquired advocacy skills through
training provided by Law Societies or the Bars of the various States and
through the
Australian Advocacy Institute.
A litigation solicitor differs from a barrister. He or
she prepares cases for hearing. The preparation tasks include speaking with
the client, finding and interviewing witnesses, finding other evidence,
engaging experts, giving advice, preparing court documents, or forwarding
material to a barrister. At times a litigation solicitor might appear in
court as an advocate.
In Australia, lawyers are entitled to work as barristers
and solicitors. Hence, solicitors can be trial advocates. However a
barrister typically joins a Bar (an association of barristers or set of
chambers) and undertakes to the State appeal court that he or she will work
exclusively as a barrister.
Not all barristers are trial or appeal advocates. Some
lawyers present to the public and the legal profession as barristers but
they are not trained or experienced advocates. They are effectively
freelance legal advisers who distinguish themselves from solicitors only
because they obtain their work mainly from other lawyers and practise from a
set of chambers with other barristers. They might for example provide
commercial advice. In addition some lawyers practise as barristers in
chambers who have had a great deal of past experience as litigation
solicitors preparing cases for trial but they have had limited advocacy
experience.
Why brief the bar?
The material and task request provided to the barrister
is called a "brief". A solicitor may have one or more of a number of reasons
for choosing to brief (that is, provide a "brief" to) a barrister. The
solicitor may be too busy to do the work connected with preparing
for, or in, court. More often the barrister is briefed because the solicitor
need helps and the barrister has expertise in a particular area or is a
specialist advocate.
When do you brief a barrister?
Advocacy focus
Immediate thought should be given to engaging a barrister
if the client has a dispute that might end up in court at some point in the
future. Advocacy is a specialist
skill. Hence, the important role of the specialist advocate.
The focal point of litigation is advocacy. Advocacy
entails communicating ideas to a court. Communication is best facilitated by
keeping ideas clear and simple. Achieving that result requires time to
master issues and facts and work preparing evidence that establishes the
facts. The relevant material must be summarised, and the summary must be
organised. Good advocacy in court is preceded by and requires much
preparation work.
The advocacy task begins when the client first
seeks advice and not at the much later stage when the matter is listed for
hearing in court.
Initial advice
When the client first seeks advice about a dispute the
essence of the legal problem should be identified and stated simply. It may be a matter, as it commonly is, involving
questions of liability of the client or someone else to pay damages, quantum
of damages and prospects of recovery of money from others. At that initial stage the
solicitor should consider the need for and choice of barrister.
Advice should be given to the client at the earliest
possible stage. It should be given in writing and should deal with the
pertinent issues of liability, quantum, recovery from other parties and
recommendations as to action to be undertaken by the client and action to be
undertaken by the lawyer. The lawyer or client may want a barrister's help
at this stage.
Advising on evidence
In order to give advice properly, evidence should be
collected at the earliest possible stage. This will consist of witness
statements, documentary material, plans, objects, photographs and any other
items of real evidence. A barrister could give some direction.
Of course, witnesses should be located and statements
taken. It is important that each witness statement is signed and witnessed.
There are various reasons for that requirement. Witnesses can disappear or
die, or change a story. A signed statement may be capable of being used at
trial. It is also important that the significance and relevance of each
document, plan, photograph or item of real evidence is explained by a
witness statement.
If it is thought that a matter will warrant the skill of
an advocate at trial then the barrister should be briefed at the earliest
stage so that the barrister can advise on the nature of the issues, the
search for evidence, the prospects of success in the matter, and the
desirability for settlement negotiations.
If counsel is briefed only after a matter has been
entered for trial (this is the point where a lawyer certifies that the
matter is ready to be allocated hearing dates), then this may be too late
for optimum resolution of the matter. Evidence may not have been collected
or it may no longer exist. Witnesses may have disappeared or died. Memories
of witnesses who can be found may have faded. Documents may have been lost
or destroyed. Real evidence may no longer exist.
Before the matter is entered for trial all relevant
documents should have been obtained and all relevant witnesses should have
been located and proofed. Further, written advice should have been given to
the client on liability and quantum and the desirability of negotiations for
settlement. Advice on evidence should have been given well before a matter
is entered for trial.
Court documents
In the course of litigation it will become necessary for
pleadings to be drafted, interrogatories to be drafted, advice on evidence
to be prepared. The lawyer or client may wish to brief a barrister to
perform these tasks or to provide advice connected with these documents.
Pre-trial hearings
A number of hearings (chambers appearances or pre-trial hearings) will occur before trial and it might be appropriate to brief counsel. This may be
so where a matter is of sufficient difficulty or importance to the client to
warrant using an advocate who has appropriate experience and skill.
Trial
This is the stage of the litigation process usually associated with use of a barrister. However a barrister
should have been engaged, and a trial brief commenced, at a much earlier
point in time. By trial stage a full brief should be in existence with
exhibits ready for tender. A barrister can give advice about the form the
trial brief should take and what must be done to control the use and organisation of documents and evidence during the trial.
How to brief a barrister?
Obtain the client’s instructions
It is important that the client knows that the solicitor
is going to brief a barrister and has expressly agree to that course. The
issue should be discussed with the client and the solicitor should obtain a
general authority to brief or specific instructions to brief on a specific
matter. The basis upon which the barrister will charge should be discussed
and agreed.
Form and content of the brief
There is no set formula for briefing a barrister, but the
ease or difficulty of the barrister's task will depend on the quality, form
and content of the brief. The quality of the brief may affect the quality of
the product that the solicitor receives back from the barrister and the time
taken for the barrister to complete the task.
The solicitor should give the barrister a summary of the
facts from which the problem emerges, a concise statement of the problem and
a statement of what the barrister is being asked to do. Observations on the
law may be helpful.
To the fullest extent possible a brief in a matter that
might end up at trial should provide relevant factual material and
documentary material and reference to any cases or statutory provisions that
the solicitor considers to be relevant. Where there is doubt about
relevance, material should be provided rather than omitted. It is much
easier for a barrister to ignore material than to begin reading a brief only
to discover that material that should be there is missing. If material is
missing the barrister must ask for further information or documents. This is
time wasting and inefficient and may create unnecessary delay in the
progress of the case.
In any case that might go to court, whether a barrister
has been briefed or not, at the earliest possible stage the solicitor should
prepare a brief. The brief should be kept separate from the correspondence
and court documents on the solicitor’s file. The brief should include
documents that identify the issues in dispute, documents and items that are
relevant to prove or disprove the issues in dispute and likely to be used at
trial, and the court documents or correspondence that might be used at trial
or in settlement negotiations.
These are the documents and items that form the basis for
advice and recommendations to the client.
The brief should be organised in a rational way, usually
according to the expected order of use of the documents to tell the relevant
story at trial. The brief should be kept under ongoing review.
Usually it is helpful to start by reviewing the
categories of documents and preparing a brief index. An example of a brief
index is at the end of this web page. These are the documents the lawyer
will need to review in order to provide updated or progress advice to
clients.
Advice should be given at periodic stages relating to the
progress of enquiries or litigation, issues of liability, quantum and
settlement, and recommendations for further action. The brief should provide
for "post opinion" documents. When an update opinion is required the task of
review may then be limited to earlier letters or documents of advice and the
newer "post opinion" documents. The makes review and the provision of advice
more time efficient and less costly for the client.
Never supply black and white photocopies of photographs.
Supply the originals or good colour copies.
BRIEF - INSURANCE